I remember my first “super-zoom point-n-shoot” digital camera. It had a tiny 3-megapixel sensor and a relatively large, clunky 10x zoom. It was probably equivalent to 28-280mm or 35-350mm. It captured JPG only, had zero manual control, and became almost useless by about ISO 400.
Digital cameras have progressed very rapidly since those early days. A cell phone camera can capture images far better than any of those chunky “compact” cameras from back then. More resolution, better high ISO performance, and the camera is the size of a pea!
Unfortunately, as a result, the “P&S” market almost completely evaporated before serious photographers’ demands for a more advanced, manual control, high-quality yet compact camera could be fully realized.
(Lightroom CC sharpening applied, no noise reduction applied)
Recently, however, some of the newer camera companies (meaning, not so much Canon or Nikon, unfortunately), have been creating some pretty impressive compact cameras that deliver the goods. Raw image capture with decent quality, impressively fast aperture lenses, wider focal lengths, and modest zoom ranges, and, of course, full manual control.
Sony’s RX100 series, and some other cameras from Panasonic and Fuji, have been looking very impressive in the super-compact range, offering near-pro quality results in a totally pocketable form factor. The Sony RX100 IV, which Anthony Thurston has already begun reviewing, is a worthy successor in that line. But what about the super-zoom? Most serious photographers wouldn’t touch a 10x (let alone 30x, or 60x) zoom P&S camera with a ten-foot pole.
In late 2013, Sony’s RX10 series aimed to change all that, with a 24-200mm equivalent zoom that hit an impressive f/2.8 aperture. Yes, 24-200mm, at f/2.8. Any full-frame DSLR shooter wanting to achieve that for a “casual” day at Disneyland with family (you’d be surprised how often I see this!) will find themselves lugging around two obscenely large zooms that tally up to about 5-7 pounds. (That’s over 3KG!)
The RX10 II delivers a smorgasbord of new improvements over its predecessor. Although it shares the same 20-megapixel number and 24-200mm f/2.8 numbers, the improvements “under the hood” are impressive. We’ll get more in-depth in our full review, but here they are at a glance:
- Up to 40X slow-motion using 960 FPS, at 1080p final output.
(Actual detail / quality may be reduced; stay tuned for additional testing!)
- Up to 14 FPS shooting speed, 5 FPS with autofocus
(without full autofocus I think, but allegedly a generous buffer)
- High-speed “Anti-Distortion” shutter up to 1/32000 sec.
- 4K video up to 29 minutes
(3840 x 2160 XAVC S MP4, with S-Log2)
- ISO 125-12800 (expands to 64-25600)
- “Stacked” sensor design
(Called”Exmor RS”; the reason behind the high-speed output)
- Some amount of weather sealing (!)
- Built-in Wifi and NFC
- High contrast XGA OLED Tru-Finder™ EVF
- Weighs 813 g / 1.79 lbs
- Price: $1298 (B&H)
On a family vacation, but still want enough quality to print a landscape? Done!
Shallow depth and smooth bokeh on a 1″ type sensor? Entirely possible!
Good quality even in dimly lit conditions? We’ll let you be the judge…
Lightroom CC Sharpening: 90 @ 1.0, Noise Reduction 35 & 35
At 100%, ISO 1600 looks pretty impressive in well-exposed
areas, even though shadows leave something to be desired
I must admit, my first reaction to any camera that looks like this is, “Oh boy, another crazy super-zoom camera. What are they up to now, 100x zoom?” But as the (Zeiss) 24-200mm f/2.8 numbers begin to sink in, you realize this is not your grandmother’s super-zoom P&S. It is a tool aimed squarely at very serious photographers.
It feels that way too. Solid enough to not feel like just another cheap electronic device, and yet light and compact enough that you’ll feel extremely thankful to not be lugging around ~7 lbs worth of DSLR and 2.8 zoom(s).
I’ve always felt that my Nikons had the best ergonomics in the past, however I certainly must give the nod to Sony for making this camera highly customizable, just like the A7R II, which I’m reviewing, too.
With f/2.8 at the equivalent of 200mm, portraits containing a good amount
of bokeh are easy to achieve. It obviously isn’t the same as true 200mm
on full-frame, but it’s still a thousand times better than a cell phone!
The focusing and shooting speed, the 4K video…pretty much all the features and performance offered are rather eye-popping considering the size and the price. I guess the only real question I have left is, are the images up to my standards as a full-time professional? Oh and of course, how good is the autofocus? I shoot many things from weddings to landscapes, so depending on the task I can be extremely demanding of high ISO performance, dynamic range, low-light autofocus, and/or fine detail.
Based on my initial glances at the test images I have so far, it is clear that this camera could be put to good use in my bag. It’s just a matter of how useful the camera will be in extremely low light or other tough conditions. Will it replace my full-frame cameras for wedding photography? No. Compact sensors smaller than 1.5x will probably never be able to truly compete with a 24x36mm sensor. However, I suspect the RX10 II will allow me to leave “the big kit” at home for many different things, and will also find its way into my professional kit for all types of “spare camera” uses.
If you’re a timelapse photographer, you can never have too many cameras! With 4K
video and built-in timelapse possible, the RX10 II makes a killer B-roll camera.
Whatever the verdict, keep an eye out here for it soon! We’ll publish our full review once we’ve got a complete set of sample images and final results for you.
Sample Sl0w-Motion Video
(Sample 4K video footage coming soon!)
In short, any consumer or prosumer should be thrilled with this camera’s features and performance. In my (initial) opinion, even a working professional could find plenty of uses for it on paid jobs! The Sony RX10 II looks to be a high-end piece of kit.
Take care and happy clicking,