
One of the first things you must learn as a new photographer is the relationship between ISO, aperture and shutter speed. Known as the “exposure triangle,” this is the basis of the photography world, as addition and subtraction are in the math realm.
Trying to wrap my mind around the relationship between these three concepts when I was just starting out was rough. I had pages and pages of notes taken from Bryan Petersen’s Understanding Exposure. I was drowning in diagrams and photos that I took at different ISO/shutter speed/aperture combinations. One day, the light bulb finally clicked and I was on my way. (Note: Check out our friends at photzy for more free photography cheat sheets).
This handy chart below would have saved me much time and tears if it were available eight years ago. Daniel Peter of Fotoblog Hamburg has created this free downloadable cheat sheet card for beginner photographers in easy to understand diagrams. The card is meant to show you a basic overview of aperture, ISO and shutter speed, but doesn’t go into much detail of what it all means. And it isn’t meant to. It is formatted for printing on a business card sized piece of paper to easily fit in your pocket when out practicing these concepts.
You can download the card on the Fotoblog Hamburg site here.
If you would rather learn via video or want to learn more, make sure you check out the SLR Lounge Photography 101 Workshop, where we show you how to create awesome images with basic gear, teach you how to move from the auto modes to manual mode and more on that tricky exposure triangle. Below is a sample of what you’ll learn from Photography 101.
Watch Understanding Exposure With The Exposure Triangle
Watch the video below to see how Pye explains the exposure triangle. This is an except directly from the Photography 101 Workshop.
Expanded Explanation of the Exposure Triangle
Shutter Speed – Shutter speeds are expressed as fractions of a second, so 1/50 is a longer period of time than 1/200. However, when people say “higher shutter speeds,” they’re referring to the faster shutter speed, not mathematically higher numbers. So even though 1/50 is greater than 1/200, the “higher” shutter would be 1/200.
Aperture – Like shutter speeds, aperture is also stated in fractions, so it’s important to know that the smaller the number the bigger the opening. Therefore, an f/1.4 is a very large opening while f/22 is a very small opening.
In its most basic sense, you can think of exposure as a bucket with an adjustable hole that opens and closes at the top and a continuous stream of water pouring into the bucket. The smaller the hole at the top, the longer the hole would need to be open in order to fill the bucket with water. Conversely, the larger the hole, the shorter amount of time the hole would need to be open in order to fill the bucket.
So in this analogy, the hole in the bucket is the aperture, the amount of time the hole is open is the shutter speed, the water pouring in is light, and a full bucket of water is a properly exposed image. If there is not much water (light), the hole (aperture) would need to be open wide; and/or the duration of the opening (shutter speed) would need to be longer in order to fill the bucket (properly expose the image). If there is a lot of light (water), the aperture (hole) would not need to be open as wide; and/or the shutter speed (the duration of the opening) could be shorter to properly expose the image (fill the bucket).
To simplify and summarize, a lot of light = faster shutter speeds/higher (smaller) apertures, while a little light = slower shutter speeds/lower (larger) apertures.
See the following shutter speed and aperture sequences in the table below. First, it’s important to note that these are not all of the possible shutter speeds or apertures, but simply an example of a full stop sequence. A full stop means you either double, or half the amount of light in the exposure. So if the hole (aperture) stays constant, going from 1/100 to 1/50 shutter speed is a full stop increase since it would double the light exposure by doubling the amount of time the water (light) fills the bucket. Likewise, if the duration (shutter speed) remained constant, going from f/2.8 to f/2 aperture is a full stop increase in light as it doubles the amount of water (light) filling the bucket by doubling the size of the hole (aperture).
Second, note that these combinations will not necessarily yield correct exposures, as this will depend on the amount of light in each respective scene. However, each one of these sequences yields the exact same level of light exposure based on our explanation above. As you move from one sequence to the next, the shutter speed decreases by one full stop, while the aperture size inreases by one full stop. Thus, the exact same amount of light is exposing the picture. If this still isn’t making sense, just take a glance at the table below and keep reading!
Shutter Speed | 1/4 second | 1/8 | 1/15 | 1/30 | 1/60 | 1/125 | 1/250 | 1/500 | 1/1000 | 1/2000 | 1/4000 |
f/stop | f/45 | f/32 | f/22 | f/16 | f/11 | f/8 | f/5.6 | f/4 | f/2.8 | f/2 | f/1.4 |
Essentially, as you double the amount of light coming in with your shutter speed (by doubling the amount of time), you need to half the amount of light you let in with your aperture and vice versa. The doubling and halving is easy to see with shutter speed (as they are multiples of 2 or a number close to 2). However, aperture is a bit more complicated, as it involves the focal length and calculating the area of the hole. We’ll save this for another post or for you to search elsewhere, but the main concept is that the area of the hole doubles and halves with each of the f/stops (aperture settings) mentioned above.
Is this starting to make sense? If not, don’t worry it will with a bit of practice. It’s actually more important to know what aperture and shutter speed actually do to the composition of the picture. In general, slower shutters capture more blur, i.e. movement or streaks of light, while faster shutter speeds freeze motion. The speed necessary to freeze the motion depends on the speed of the movement of your subjects. If you would like to know what your minimum shutter speed to avoid hand shake, a good general rule to follow is the reciprocal rule (explained in our article on the reciprocal rule).
The lower the aperture, the shallower your depth of field. What does this mean? Well, if I’m at a low aperture (f/1.4, f/2.8, etc) and I focus on one person in a line of people extending towards and away from my camera, everyone before and after him will be blurry. In contrast, if I wanted more people in focus, I would chose a smaller (higher) aperture (f/8, f/11, etc). This is actually identical to the way our eyes work. Ever notice how you squint to try to see something more clearly? It should be mentioned that for overall sharpness, there are ideal apertures that vary for each lens (we’ll save this for another post or for you to research). Furthermore as you shrink your aperture (f/8, f/11, and up), you may start to run into diffraction (see our article on diffraction).
ISO – As if this wasn’t enough information to process already, there is a third factor called ISO (or film speed). Basically, the higher your ISO, the less light you need (allowing for faster shutter speeds and smaller apertures). You can think of ISO as an artificial way of creating more light, or for instance forcing the water (light) into the bucket by pressurizing it. There is a trade off though to using ISO to increase available light, higher ISO’s will yield grainier, less-than-tack-sharp images. The effect of this depends on your camera and its sensor quality. For example, we cap our ISOs at 800 (ideally 400 or under) on our Canon 40Ds and at 6400 (ideally under 3200) for our Canon 5D Mark IIs. Although you can get acceptable images above these figures, we prefer to limit the grain in our images and use our knowledge of light and flash to compensate.
We hope this helps. Feel free to comment if you have anything to add.
Hanssie
14 Comments
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
id like to see over lay of cropped vs full frame vs medium format
cool
Everybody should know this , great way of explaining the science
Good way to understand it.
Great chart, makes for quick basic learning/understanding of the settings for those uncomfortable with switching out of auto mode.
excellent chart
A good reference for people starting out in photography.
People sometimes forget that a beginner needs information in a simple easy to conceptualize format. Later, when they become more experienced, they can delve in to the “exceptions” and nuances.
A good way to turn a beginner off something is to immediately delve too deeply before they have a basic understanding of the core concepts.
This chart is not for calculating exposure!
F32 at 1/1000 is not F22 at 1/500
It is meant to show you how
Depth of field changes from F32 to F1.4
What the aperture looks like from F32 to F1.4
How motion blur changes from 1/1000 to 1/2
And how noise changes from ISO 100 to ISO 25600
Again its not an exposure calculation chart
cool chart
Not really. It’s okay as a basic concept, but it’s not entirely accurate with respect to modern systems.
For example, not really seeing the impact of diffraction with aperture changes, leading one to believe that f/32 might result in a sharp image throughout the scene. On the noise front, the sensor tech is advancing to the point that 25,600 isn’t an end point and the visible noise curve of the average camera isn’t in agreement anymore.
Remember, it’s just for those who need help to remember the differences, beginners. If one needs an aid to remember which f number corresponds to a small opening of the diaphragm, it’s probably not time to worry about the noise floor, or the effect of diffraction. The chart’s just a rule of thumb, as the author says, “it isn’t meant to” go into detail. My beginning students are smart enough to know that this cool chart is just a rule of thumb, and will get the details later. One doesn’t need to worry about diffraction or noise when taking photos of a napping cat.
Kind of like the Bohr-Rutherford model of the atom. Sort of accurate, but not really true, and eventually you learn that it’s actually quite off the mark and not all that useful unless you’re experimenting with hydrogen atoms and then only marginally.
It also doesn’t really address the question of the exposure triangle, the relationship between the three isn’t touched. If I was to just read that as laid out, as a beginner, I might reasonably assume that f/1.4, 1/2 seconds, or ISO 25600 might give me similar results.
All in all, the more I think about it, the less useful I see it, especially for beginners.
Like the Violet Catastrophe?
Here’s the blog translated
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://blog.hamburger-fotospots.de/genialer-spickzettel-fuer-fotografen-als-kostenloser-download/&prev=search