WEDDING SEASON SALE! 30% Off Training Systems!

Your content will be up shortly. Please allow up to 5 seconds
Gear & Apps

DXO: Sony FE 100-400mm GM OSS Sharper Than Canon’s $11K 200-400mm F/4L But Not Better All Around

By Kishore Sawh on July 29th 2017

The A9 isn’t a sports camera because Sony doesn’t have any long glass.” That’s the stock response from A9 critics when faced with the claim that the A9 is indeed a sports camera. It’s so prevalent a critique it’s almost an adage, and, arguably, inaccurate.

The critique also has no legs for longevity because we can assume that Sony will be releasing some fast, long glass soon, given their typical pace. In the meantime (which we suspect will be a short time) the FE 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 GM OSS has arrived, and it’s very, very good.

We had a chance to spend some time with it a few months back, and while it was for a short duration it was enough to know they had something special. It was a high-performing 400mm with a small footprint and for under $3k. Now, that feeling is backed up by DXO’s technical review of the 100-400 GM, and it proves to not only be a Canon contender, but a Canon beater.

“While there has been some slightly improved performance in more recent models, such as the Canon EF 100-400mm 4.5-5.6L IS II, Sony’s new FE 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 GM OSS stands out not only for its seismic shift in sharpness, but also for being not much different in size to the FE 70-200mm F2.8. Best of all, perhaps, is that for once there’s a tele-zoom that offers seriously impressive image quality at that prized 400mm focal length.”

Compared to the Canon EF 100-400mm 4.5-5.6L IS II, which has very similar specifications, the Sony FE 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 GM OSS surpasses it in overall performance, even if it doesn’t quite have the excellent uniform performance of the Canon over the focal range. Still, the Sony delivers significantly higher sharpness levels at both ends of the zoom range when wide-open, including the vaunted 400mm focal length and matches it in-between. Stopped down, the Sony is sharper at every focal length.”

[REWIND: Sony Releases 2 New Zoom Lenses | Hands On With The Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 G Master & 12-24mm f/4 G]

That’s high praise, because those Canon lenses are excellent, and to give credit where it is due DXO is clear that the Canon 100-400 has more even uniformity of performance across the range, and the 200-400 f/4L still gets an overall DXO score of 30 vs the Sony’s 29. That said, the 200-400L is a $11,000 lens compared to the Sony’s price tag of $2,800, and the Sony is still sharper. The holdout of the L? Obviously it has more transmission given it’s f/4 throughout, but also better handling of CA.

It’s hard to imagine that Sony will rest on its laurels as the A9 proliferates in the wild and not develop more fast glass, primes included. In fact, given that Sony has fleshed out the ‘trinity’ of zooms for the FE line as they did in May we’d expect long and fast glass are next on the docket. And if they’re anything like this 100-400 GM, well, it’ll be interesting to see if the critics change their tune. We’re certainly seeing the maturation of the Sony E-mount this year, and matriculation is rapid.

We’ll get the 100-400mm GM in soon for a longer look.


PS – Interesting to note though, that of the lenses pitted against each other within the realm, it was Sigma who came out on top overall with their120-300mm f/2.8…

Source: DXO Mark

This site contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links, however, this does not impact accuracy or integrity of our content.

A photographer and writer based in Miami, he can often be found at dog parks, and airports in London and Toronto. He is also a tremendous fan of flossing and the happiest guy around when the company’s good.

Q&A Discussions

Please or register to post a comment.

  1. Tim Driman

    I live in South Africa and when I imported my SONYA9, I had to purchase the SONY 70mm – 200mmf2.8 + 2x converter to achieve 400mm focal reach ( I am a wildlife and action sports photog )…. The results so far, are really exciting,  and I actually prefer the idea of this combination to the straight 100mm-400mm for a few reasons…

    My image quality is awesome ( I also shoot a Canon 1DX MKii / 200mm-400mmf4.0+1.4x which delivers awesome results) 

    I know this  700mm-200mmf2.8 + 2x converter is more expensive overall, compared to the straight 100mm-400mm, but it does not physically extend in length, and it is actually two lens options a) as 70mm-200mmf2.8 and b) the 140mm-400mmf5.6…

    I have absolutely no doubt that SONY will repeat their surpizes when they pop up with something to give the Canon 200mm-400mmf4.0+1.4x a run for it’s money…. My guess it will be something like a 200mm-500mmf4.0+1.4x built in converter… Which will really blow CANIKON backwards…Just saying :-)

    | |
    • Kishore Sawh

      This is great. It’s something we were considering testing out, pitting the 70-200 GM with a 2x tele against the 100-400. Racked out it’ll be 5.6 on both, and for those who already have a 70-200, it would be interesting to see if the performance on 70-200 +tele combo would suffice or if the 100-400 would still be worth it. 

      | |
  2. Black Z Eddie

    When Sony fills the lens gaps, next thing critics will complain about is they don’t have a 16.34243mm to 945.2467mm f.095.  LOL

    | |
    • Kishore Sawh

      Ha. True dat. It’s interesting that I get bombarded with accusations of being Sony favorable, when, I don’t even shoot Sony at all. I just find it absolutely astonishing that anyone can objectively look at what they’re doing, their trajectory, and talk smack. 

      | |
    • Eric Salas

      [Eric Salas has deleted this comment]

      | | Edited  
    • Cthulion The Great

      It’s a nice lens, but not a sports lens so in still waiting to see what they come up in that front. 

      Focal length is not everything – there’s a reason why people haul huge lenses, it’s called f/2.8.

      | |