The Complete Wedding Training System is Finally Here!

Your content will be up shortly. Please allow up to 5 seconds
News & Insight

Canon 85mm 1.2 L vs Canon 85mm 1.4 L | ‘Why I Dumped My 1.2’ – Vanessa Joy

By Vanessa Joy Photography on July 2nd 2018

Out of all of my Canon lenses over the years, the Canon 85mm 1.2 L was my favorite, and something I’ve even alluded to in this video. It was the one I held just a little more carefully than the others; the one I took out when I knew the wedding moment was really special; my go-to when I wanted to make a bride look particularly awesome, and my saving grace when I had a dark ceremony to work with.

But I just sold it.

[LENS Review: Canon 85mm f/1.4L IS USM Lens Review | Maybe The Most Versatile 85mm Lens On The Market.]

It was quite the breakup and I thought long and hard about it. In the end, my heart was just elsewhere, as I fell for the new Canon 85mm 1.4.

The obvious question you’re likely to have in mind then, is, “Why would you do that?” After all, the glory of a lens is held in the aperture, right? Not quite.

When I first got word of the new 85 and it’s 1.4 aperture, I almost immediately ceased listening to the person telling me about it because, why would a photographer ever want to lose a stop of light? There wouldn’t be much I would prefer of the 1.4 over the venerable 1.2, I thought. I was wrong.

Here’s why I walked into the Adorama Trade In Counter and dumped my old heartthrob for a new love.

Image Stabilization

On a good day, to ensure sharp images I’ll be shooting at 1/250th of a second with my 85mm in order to avoid motion blur, which you’d be forgiven for thinking is atypically fast for that focal length. Maybe it’s the barely-legal amount of caffeine I consume throughout the day, but I’m shakier than a leaf in Autumn, and as such, I live off the Image stabilization on all the lenses that have it, like my 70-200mm 2.8. And by the way, you should check out the Series III version that was just released, in addition to the small but mighty 70-200 II f/4 version (which I’ve got my eye on for sure). But I digress…

Image stabilization in any lens is a huge bonus for me. In fact, it’s a must-have if it can be had. The second a somewhat blurry picture comes across my Lightroom it is 100% garbage to me. I want a crisp image, every single time.

But what about 1.2?

Allow me to admit something: I know I am perceived by some as a wide-open light & airy wedding photographer, but I almost never shoot at 1.2. Why? See “Image Stabilization” above. Maybe I’m just not good at shooting at 1.2 and I need to practice my focus skills, but really, 1.4 is plenty to get a beautifully smooth background.

Not only is it plenty, “It’s like butta.” (That’s “butter” for you non-Jersey/New Yorkers). Which is what a friend said to me when I asked him how he found the performance of the lens, and I concur. The 85 1.4 is like butter on a perfectly toasted NYC bagel; crisp and smooth all at the same time. It’s harmony.

Focusing

This was huge for me. I rarely used my 85mm 1.2 in dark receptions because just didn’t focus fast enough to catch the action, and this is the general consensus of those who have owned the 1.2. The 85mm 1.4, on the flip side, has faster focusing and I loved using it not only during receptions but for engagement sessions and portraits to catch the action. In fact, if you want to see me using (drooling over) it the first time I used it, check out this REAL engagement session I streamed on Facebook LIVE.

Weight

Image courtesy Brittany Smith

It wouldn’t be the first time I’ve said it, but it warrants saying again that I just love the feeling of a meaty camera system in my hands, and I still do. Nevertheless, those 12-hour wedding days are enough to make any photographer’s arm start to tire. If I’m able to drop camera weight by a few ounces and not lose a spec of customer-noticeable quality, I’m all for it, and that’s precisely what the new 1.4 allows me to do.

Fear not, however, the 1.4 doesn’t appear to be dinky in anyway. Its still has that beautiful L-Series glass red stripe that I’m just a sucker for, which sort of reminds me of Christian Louboutin shoe bottoms, to be honest – Don’t judge. We all take our creative boosts from somewhere, don’t we?

In Summary

All in all, I didn’t especially want to do a Canon 85mm 1.2 vs Canon 85mm 1.4 test, because my favorite lens was on the line! But after honest and practical testing of the 85 1.4 though, I knew it was time for a switch. Better focusing speed, remarkable IS (first for an 85), weight, and the lower price point? Sold! – to the girl in the CLB shoes…

*see more sample images below

Image courtesy Brittany Smith

Terms: #Prime Lens

Vanessa Joy is a professional New Jersey and New York City wedding photographer capturing NJ, NY, Hamptons, Long Island, NYC and destination weddings. With an emphasis on luxury weddings with an extravagant flair, Vanessa Joy focuses on creating a unique boutique experience with each of her couple’s wedding photography. Vanessa is an experienced photographer who has captured everything from Jersey Shore Weddings and NYC weddings, to elegant formal affairs at Pennsylvania farms and vintage chic weddings with intricate wedding details.

Q&A Discussions

Please or register to post a comment.

  1. adam sanford

    Pros of new lens:  Focuses before next tuesday, has IS, no more focus by wire, internally focusing (no more telescoping inner barrel nonsense)

    Con of new lens:  You lose a fraction of a stop of light / isolation on the wide open end.

    Reality of both lenses:  mirrorbox clipping of bokeh balls in parts of the frame because (I believe the wide open aperture is physically larger than the mirrorbox.

    No brainer.  Get the f/1.4L IS over the f/1.2.

    | |
    • Kishore Sawh

      mirrorbox bokeh balls are the bane of your existence, Adam.  I really need to get in some units to highlight this for the public

      | |
    • adam sanford

      Just an interesting oddity, K.  For those who are aware of it, they should just be aware that both of these lenses show it.

      It would not stop me one bit from buying this lens if I shot portaiture.  I’ve shot the 85 f/1.4L IS and it’s a peach.

      | |
  2. Vangelis Medina

    ” to lose a stop of light”

    You mean 1/3 of a stop?

    | |