TPF in photography is an acronym for “time for print” or “trade for print.” TPF is an arrangement between creative professionals like photographers, models, stylists, MUAs, and others, whereby the professionals agree to trade their services in exchange for the rights to utilize the images for their portfolios or other marketing uses. For example, a common TFP arrangement is when a photographer works with a model without either side receiving any compensation. The photographer receives free time with a model for his or her own purposes, such as practice or building a portfolio. In exchange, the model receives an agreed upon number of images for to use for his or her own purposes. In this article, we’ll discuss the TFP process and pinpoint some the major issues with the practice.
Time for print are three words are often found to be nauseating and a slap in the face by a number of photographers, especially after paying one’s dues. What is even more alarming is the number of hypocrites among us asking up-and-coming hair and makeup artists and wardrobe stylists to provide their talents for free on a paid shoot in exchange for exposure.
A photographer that works with people will most likely be asked to be a part of or actively choose to participate in TFP shoots while nurturing a blossoming career. There are definitely some advantages that can come from unpaid work. These collaborations can build a wonderful network, establish a solid creative team and exponentially increase the caliber of a portfolio. As a common courtesy, take the time to properly tag everyone involved on social media. Some future jobs are attained by word of mouth from these TFP shoots. You can find additional tips for maximizing free shoots in our guest post here on Adorama’s blog.
Since there is no monetary compensation for product used or services rendered, every TFP shoot should be mutually beneficial for all parties involved. Trade shoots are a time to try out new hairstylists, makeup artists and fashion stylists for future work. There are a large number of creative teams that are founded by testing together and developing a good working relationship. Everyone works together to improve their book and get to that next level, whatever it may be.
Some good uses of TFP are wedding vendor collaborations for publication or advertising, testing out new gear and lighting, and fashion stories or editorials. Everyone is working toward a common goal and end product. Everyone’s time and efforts are valuable; they should be treated as such. I currently plan out my editorials and curate my team for the best results with the understanding that a good team will invest in higher end products. Since I am not paying to renew my co-collaborator’s kits, I will often provide food and coffee throughout the day as a sign of my appreciation.
Situations arise that fall beyond this scope of practice and not everyone gets something out of it. For example, a makeup artist may request a photoshoot that demonstrates a skill set that falls outside of the established repertoire of your book. In this case it is perfectly acceptable to request compensation as you are doing them a favor. Say the shoe is on the other foot and a better working model is necessary to properly execute a shoot. It would be wise to invest in the model since they are doing you a favor.
When money is guaranteed to be involved
At the end of the day, we all want to get paid to do what we love. When money exchanges hands, services are no longer considered fair trade, therefore it is not ok to expect a creative team go without compensation. Nothing says I don’t respect you quite like asking for free creative services in exchange for exposure while getting paid. Treat everyone the way that you would want to be treated and the reward is plentiful.
Many photographers, retouchers, and other members of the trade are offering workshops. If a workshop is on the horizon as a business endeavor, it is essential to invest in the Team and price it accordingly. I have seen firsthand the immaculate quality of work that comes out of a properly budgeted production and what happens when a sledgehammer starts chipping away at it. It should come as no surprise that going the bottom of the barrel route typically produces less than mediocre work and it also brings up the question of integrity, neither of which is good.
Sophie. Hair and makeup by Jaye D Nelson. • • • • #fashiongram #fashionable #fashionphotographer #bikini #swimwear #blackandwhite #bw_lover #bw_society #bw #onelight #nyc #mood #simple #minimal #portrait
A post shared by Brittany Smith (@brittanysmithphoto) on
For example, I was once asked to cut the bulk of the team’s budget and offer exposure across a company’s social networks as compensation while halving the models’ previously agreed to day rate. The creative team was there physically, but there was a lack of energy and magic that usually ensues. The models, on the other hand, didn’t show up and finding replacements delayed the entire workday by several hours.
The quality over quantity route is definitely the way to go. Choosing to gut production value for the sake of a slightly larger profit margin only causes unnecessary stress. Invest in the team with the final product in mind and people will see its value. You get what you pay for.