Equipment Review – The 50mm f/1.4 vs. 50mm f/1.8


The 50mm f1.4 USM Lens Equipment Review   The 50mm f/1.4 vs. 50mm f/1.8 is almost universally owned by wedding photographers.   However, before singing its praises, I wanted to start off by discussing the lens’ few shortcomings.

Cons

First, the inability to zoom in and out makes being in the right place at the right time and knowing the lens very well imperative to capturing every moment. This makes it difficult, but not impossible, to use if you’re the lead photographer. If you plan on using it frequently throughout the day, we recommend you know the schedule backwards, plan ahead and be prepared (hey, isn’t that the Boy Scouts motto?)

Secondly, the maximum sharpness for the lens is not at f/1.4, but somewhere between f/3.5-f/5.6.   At f/1.4, the edges lose their sharpness and even the center is not at its maximum sharpness.

Lastly, using f/1.4 can be risky, as it requires the utmost focus precision since your focal plan is extremely small (less than 1″ at times depending on distance from the lens). Slightly missing your target or taking an image of two people slightly on different planes can yield unusable images.

Pros

50mm f1.4 LensHowever, that said, every amateur to professional photographer should own this lens! First of all, it’s probably the most affordable lens you can buy. If there were a value per dollar ratio used in this industry, this lens would be at or near the top.

In low light, the 1.4 f/stop gives us incredible versatility. As harsh flash can ruin any photo, the 1.4 allows us to use natural or very soft light and still expose an image properly. Furthermore, the wide aperture allows us to bring out dark backgrounds and capture natural ambient lighting, creating beautiful imagery without having to increase the ISO to unacceptably grainy levels. At 1.4, we’re also able to use higher shutter speeds and still properly expose an image. The number one complaint I’ve heard from clients in regards to “bad” photographers is that œthe images came out blurry.  With faster shutters, this problem would be significantly reduced.

Even in situations with more light, shooting at f/1.4 gives your images a œpop-off-the-page” look, as everything in front of or behind the subject is blurred. This 1) helps focus the image on your subject, 2) makes the subject seem more crisp (in relation to its surroundings), and 3) allows you to blur out unappealing objects or backgrounds.

So, how much better is the 1.4 than the 1.8?   The 50mm f/1.8 lens is cheap, under $100; and to its credit, the f/1.8 is a great started prime lens given its quality to cost. However, its overall design and light feel can only be described as cheap when compared to the f/1.4.   Aside from price and feel, overall image quality really is not comparable, especially the bokeh (blur). Comparing image quality from the f/1.4 to the f/1.8 is like comparing an L lens to a standard EF-S lens. Lastly, and this one matters for us wedding photographers, the auto focus is quite loud compared to the f/1.4. Loud enough that it can actually be a distraction during quiet moments in a ceremony.

_________________________________________________________________________________
Article written by:
Pye Jirsa
Lead Photographer | Partner
Lin and Jirsa Wedding Photography
_________________________________________________________________________________

Like this post? Share it!

  • Tweet
  • Facebook
  • Diggit
  • Delicious
  • Diggit
  • Diggit

  • http://blog.audio-frog.com Kevin

    Nice article! I’m glad that I purchased the 1.4 instead of the 1.8. I was scouring the entire web looking for a definitive answer to this debate and I think you nailed it.

  • http://www.josephwilliamphotography.com Joseph William Photography

    Do you prefer the 35mm lens on a DX sensor camera that is then equivalent to the 50mm lens on a full frame DSLR camera? Or a 50mm lens on the smaller frame camera as well?

  • http://www.stephaniewalesphotography.com Stephanie Wales Photography

    Huh. This my go-to lens every time. Especially during the reception or dance floor shots. It’s this, the 105 Micro, the 70-200 2.8, and a super-wide. I would NEVER start or end a wedding without this lens on my camera. It’s a rock. And serisuly, is it really that hard to move forwards or backwards to your subject? Zooming is totally over rated.

  • http://flickr.com/photos/sharmo Michael Sharman

    Stephanie I’m curious about your feelings on the 50mm, but only in terms of fixed focal length.

    I’m not a wedding photog, but it would seem to me that you never know what situation you’ll be in at a wedding and there surely must be times during the ceremony where you simply can’t get close enough to use the 50?

    Either that or between you switching from taking shot’s of the couple, the priest/celebrant and candids of the audience…seems a 50mm would make life very tricky.

    Any chance you can help me out with this? You ever find it tough to be in multiple places at once with the 50?

RELATED ARTICLES


  1. Equipment Review – Canon 5D Mark II & Wedding Photography
  2. Equipment Review – Diffusing Flash with the Demb “Flip-It”
  3. Equipment Review – 4 Reasons to Use Neutral Density (ND) Filters
  4. Sticky Filters Review | Photography Equipment
  5. Equipment Review – Pocket Wizard Plus II

Write Photography Tips


SLR Lounge is a resource for photography tutorials, photo news, camera reviews and more. We're in search of writers to cover a range of topics. Click to learn more about our jobs.

SUBSCRIPTIONS


Polls


What Type of Photographer Are You?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...