Advertisement

Shoot or Intervene: Photographers Who Didn’t Step in to Help

Mob attack, by Greg Marinovich

Mob attack, by Greg Marinovich

All these other men started chasing him, and he hadn’t gone far when he was brought down. About 15 or 20 men were all around him, hitting and stabbing and clubbing. And I was right there, photographing it. On the one hand, I was horrified, and at the same time I was thinking: what should the exposure be?

It was the old days: analogue, manual focus, crappy cameras. I felt torn between the horror of what I was seeing and trying to capture it.

… as a journalist, my reaction was fine, as a human being I felt I’d really let myself down. …I was gutted that I’d been such a coward

- Mob attack, by Greg Marinovich

This is an excerpt of Marinovich’s account on his first time being in a conflict situation, as featured in the Guardian’s powerful article Photographers who didn’t step in to help. He was covering migrant workers in South Africa as a photojournalist when all of a sudden, 15-20 men with spears and clubs started to chase after one man. That man was quickly surrounded, beaten and stabbed to death, all while Marinovich documented the event with his camera. That man’s only crime was being a member of another tribe.

He feared for his own life, being a white man taking photos of a murder, but in the end, the mob was not worried. Two of the men even invited Marinovich to take a photo of them with the body. Marinovich walked away unscathed, but realized that his inaction that resulted in the killing of a man. That event left a lasting impact on him.


We all heard that photojournalists have a professional code of ethic to capture the images as is, to observe and record, and to not interfere. But what if that code means letting someone to die in front of you?

The eight photojournalists in the article faced a crisis of conscience during situations such as a mob attack, a domestic violence abuse, a protest, a stoning, and so on. Some stayed behind their cameras. Others intervened. Here are some more excerpts from what they experienced:

. That was the first time I saw him commit an act of violence, and my instinct was to get the picture first…When I saw his hand go back to hit her a second time, I grabbed his arm and said, “What the hell are you doing? You’re going to hurt her!” He threw me off and said, “She’s my wife and I know my own strength, but I have to teach her a lesson that she can’t lie to me”, but from that point on he didn’t hit her again.”

- Domestic violence, by By Donna Ferrato


The crowd chased him and threw rocks at him; children and adults beat him with sticks. Finally, he was totally exhausted and fell to the ground quite near where I was standing. And I went on photographing.

To my shame, it never occurred to me to do anything. To start with, we were white. On our own. The other two photographers didn’t get out of the car. Suddenly I realised that Tom [Editor of Picture Post] had walked into the crowd and stood over the guy. People were so amazed, they just stood back. The man was able to stagger up, around a corner and escape. It was an amazing thing to do. Tom undoubtedly saved the man’s life. And, frankly, it had not for a moment occurred to me to intervene.

- Stoning, by Ian Berry


I feel bad about it. I was frightened, so I just stuck to my professional duty. But life as a photojournalist teaches you that during this kind of violence, getting involved won’t end it; it will just lead to more people getting hurt. With the lootings, you’re dealing with group psychology. A looter won’t act like a person, they’ll just go with the wave of action. You feel powerless, but the power you hold is in your job: to tell the story.

- London riots, by Kerim Okten


To read the rest of their stories in depth, visit The Guardian.

What would you do if you found yourself in these similar situation while you are on assignment?


Advertisement
  • http://www.facebook.com/brandon.magpantay Brandon Magpantay

    Kenny, seriously, I know you’re the same person that post this crap on this site all the time. If you don’t like how SLRLounge operate, why don’t you find another site and post your useless opinion there. Better yet, go out and do something productive.

    It’s nothing new what Joe and other staff here put on their site, in fact, if you go to Yahoo!, some of their contents are borrowed from a different site and at the end of the article, they include the website where they found the original content.

    -_-

    • http://tambnguyen.com/ Tam Nguyen Photography

      Kenny who?

  • http://tambnguyen.com/ Tam Nguyen Photography

    Hard to say, but yes, if there’s such ethic that you need to follow, I’d probably follow it. Same thing goes with doctors. If a serial killer came to the hospital for some urgent care, do the doctors let him die, or save the serial killer’s life?

  • Pye

    @Kenny, just like @Brandon said, like Gizmodo, PetaPixel, FStoppers, Engadget, Yahoo, we will post relevant news and source all the images and text to the original creators. We put in our 2 cents on a topic, and post for you guys to discuss. We are not, nor have we ever stolen text or images and claimed them as our own. Thanks!

    • http://tambnguyen.com/ Tam Nguyen Photography

      I don’t see any post from Kenny. Maybe it’s been marked as spam or been deleted?

      Then again it sounds kinda negative, so I guess I’m not missing out much.

      • Pye

        Looks like enough users marked it spam, so it was removed.

  • http://twitter.com/arturomieussens Arturo Mieussens

    Human beings should also have a code of ethic too.

    If you really can´t help or would make things worst, or if you are afraid for your own safety I guess it’s ok to decide not to act. But if you didn’t even think about doing anything or just decide not to do it and prefer to get the picture then yes, you’re a piece of sh*t. The good news is you’re not alone.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1161657585 Ryan Cooper

    It is horrific and so difficult, and I understand Greg’s sadness that he did not help. But what could he really have done other than get himself killed as well? I doubt he could stop 20 frenzied murderers armed with spears even if he had a firearm, which I doubt he did. Ultimately documenting a travesty like this is the best think he can do morally because it really can lead to awareness which can lead to preventing acts like this from continung.

  • mccrna

    I was a 19yr old Medic with a Army Engineer Minesweep team and we came upon a highway bridge which had been attacked in the pre dawn hours. The soldiers who guarded the bridge lived there with their families. As I watched whole families being extracted from the debris of there living quarters and layed on the roadside I took out my Pentax and started taking photos. After the first photo I had to remove my eye from the viewfinder because I felt like I was trespassing on the end of life situation of all the dead women, children and there soldier spouses. I continued taking photos by just aiming my camera in the general direction from waist level. I still have the photos and they help me to explain my Vietnam experience to family and friends. As a soldier I know that I wouldn’t have been taking photographs if the actual assault would have been occuring in real time, I would have been involved in the fight. I think that anyone involved in life or death situations makes that instantaneous decison to act or not regardless of having a camera in their hands.

  • Pingback: Would You Intervene? | multigrade4

  • Pingback: Witness: HBO's New Documentary on War Photographers

  • Pingback: Pulitzer Photographers & Others Respond to NY Post Subway Photo

Read previous post:
Splash-Hood-or-UV
Do You use a Filter, Hood, or Neither on Your Lenses?

There is an article on PetaPixel about how much of a difference there is between a cheap UV filter and...

Close