Comments on: Know which Hi-ISO Photos is from Olympus OM-D & which is from Nikon D700?

By: JT

JT — Mon, 13 Aug 2012 21:06:00 +0000

I like the IQ comparison, but feel the size comparision conveyed is misleading. It would be a better caparison to use the Nikon 24mm f/2.8 on the D700 or to have used the Olympus 14-35mm f2.0 SWD on the OM-D

By: Paul-Pierre

Paul-Pierre — Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:21:00 +0000

Nice comparison. It gives an impression of the high ISO performance of both camera’s. However, these photos where made in relatively good light. It even looks like it was daylight too. Daylight has all the colors in it. Artificial light often has not and that’s when a digital camera will show it’s true colors.

Pierre-Paul could have tried another scene with less light, higher contrast and more shadow regions. The image quality of the micro 4/3 sensors quickly deteriorates and the Nikon full frame sensor will do better for sure. I don’t think micro 4/3 technology is suitable for serious low light work yet. Maybe in a year or five it will be. If you don’t need good low light performance and don’t mind the harsh contrast, a micro 4/3 camera is an interesting light weight alternative.

By: CamMan

CamMan — Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:29:00 +0000

but…
d700 is a Full Frame.. compare to micro 4/3.. – d700 must be better and it is but NOT SUPER MORE
Olympus is really great.
Its like comperision Maybach to Porshe 911 GT – cannot compare couse r two different cars but Porshe and Maybach r excelent !

By: iam

iam — Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:39:00 +0000

READ PROPERLY…IT WAS D700 no D7000
u should get a reading glasses

By: Gert Olesen

Gert Olesen — Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:51:00 +0000

feel fre to look at my pictures on my web site http://www.dinkok.dk all taken with the GF1 think 4/3 perform fantastic.