<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HOT OFF THE PRESS WITH LIVE UPDATES! More Photos &amp; Info on Canon Mirrorless EOS M!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slrlounge.com/hot-off-the-press-canon-mirrorless-eos-m-revealed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slrlounge.com/hot-off-the-press-canon-mirrorless-eos-m-revealed</link>
	<description>Photography tips and photography tutorials and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:24:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Embt</title>
		<link>http://www.slrlounge.com/hot-off-the-press-canon-mirrorless-eos-m-revealed#comment-44325</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Embt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 03:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slrlounge.com/?p=132469#comment-44325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right, I looked closer and there are some changes that I missed at first.  Even though everything is rotated a bit the uniform pin spacing seems like it would not play nicely with the gap in regular EF pins.  Actually, looking at the ratio of pin sizes to the mount as a whole, it looks like this mount may be smaller diameter overall.  I guess that would make some sense if it&#039;s for smaller cameras and will be APS-C.  In any case I&#039;d be shocked if there weren&#039;t some way for people to mount up SLR lenses, it&#039;s too tempting an upgrade path not to allow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, I looked closer and there are some changes that I missed at first.  Even though everything is rotated a bit the uniform pin spacing seems like it would not play nicely with the gap in regular EF pins.  Actually, looking at the ratio of pin sizes to the mount as a whole, it looks like this mount may be smaller diameter overall.  I guess that would make some sense if it&#8217;s for smaller cameras and will be APS-C.  In any case I&#8217;d be shocked if there weren&#8217;t some way for people to mount up SLR lenses, it&#8217;s too tempting an upgrade path not to allow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hamachijohn</title>
		<link>http://www.slrlounge.com/hot-off-the-press-canon-mirrorless-eos-m-revealed#comment-44321</link>
		<dc:creator>hamachijohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 00:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slrlounge.com/?p=132469#comment-44321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[agree. I&#039;m sure the technical specs will be nice, but what an UGLY camera... I&#039;ve been looking at the competition, drooling over the aesthetics and nostalgia... and this is what I&#039;ve been waiting patiently for? Hope the future models aren&#039;t the same body...
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agree. I&#8217;m sure the technical specs will be nice, but what an UGLY camera&#8230; I&#8217;ve been looking at the competition, drooling over the aesthetics and nostalgia&#8230; and this is what I&#8217;ve been waiting patiently for? Hope the future models aren&#8217;t the same body&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kinematic</title>
		<link>http://www.slrlounge.com/hot-off-the-press-canon-mirrorless-eos-m-revealed#comment-44318</link>
		<dc:creator>Kinematic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slrlounge.com/?p=132469#comment-44318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than just a dot placement. The bayonet is rotated counter clockwise by a couple of degrees and the contacts are rotated clockwise by 10 degrees or so. The bayonet looks like the same and maybe the odd EF lens will fit it (I doubt the EF-S lens will fit on there), but the flange distance will make them inoperable, and with the contacts in a different location will not allow them to operate with the EOS functions. Not sure why it&#039;s the same bayonet, but perhaps it&#039;s easier to machine the same pieces but just to relocate the lock pin hole after rotation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than just a dot placement. The bayonet is rotated counter clockwise by a couple of degrees and the contacts are rotated clockwise by 10 degrees or so. The bayonet looks like the same and maybe the odd EF lens will fit it (I doubt the EF-S lens will fit on there), but the flange distance will make them inoperable, and with the contacts in a different location will not allow them to operate with the EOS functions. Not sure why it&#8217;s the same bayonet, but perhaps it&#8217;s easier to machine the same pieces but just to relocate the lock pin hole after rotation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.slrlounge.com/hot-off-the-press-canon-mirrorless-eos-m-revealed#comment-44317</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 11:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slrlounge.com/?p=132469#comment-44317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fair point, any EVF i have ever used has been awful with lag and shocking quality. obviously a proper OVF isn&#039;t possible on a mirrorless but my point was more &quot;anything but an EVF&quot; but apparently they have improved since I last tried one. Thanks for the correction:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fair point, any EVF i have ever used has been awful with lag and shocking quality. obviously a proper OVF isn&#8217;t possible on a mirrorless but my point was more &#8220;anything but an EVF&#8221; but apparently they have improved since I last tried one. Thanks for the correction:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Wagner</title>
		<link>http://www.slrlounge.com/hot-off-the-press-canon-mirrorless-eos-m-revealed#comment-44309</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slrlounge.com/?p=132469#comment-44309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EVF is essential for shooting in bars, Blues/Jazz joints, concert halls, back stage. The rear LCD is like carrying a flashlight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EVF is essential for shooting in bars, Blues/Jazz joints, concert halls, back stage. The rear LCD is like carrying a flashlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 386/393 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d2icr5g9bedq6k.cloudfront.net
Application Monitoring using New Relic

 Served from: www.slrlounge.com @ 2013-05-19 20:37:03 by W3 Total Cache -->