<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gear Review: Why We Love the Pocket Wizard Plus III</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slrlounge.com/gear-review-why-we-love-the-pocket-wizard-plus-iii/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slrlounge.com/gear-review-why-we-love-the-pocket-wizard-plus-iii</link>
	<description>Photography tips and photography tutorials and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:20:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adi Marwan</title>
		<link>http://www.slrlounge.com/gear-review-why-we-love-the-pocket-wizard-plus-iii#comment-44963</link>
		<dc:creator>Adi Marwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slrlounge.com/?p=135111#comment-44963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[have you guys check out phottix odin? =)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have you guys check out phottix odin? =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slrlounge.com/gear-review-why-we-love-the-pocket-wizard-plus-iii#comment-44905</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slrlounge.com/?p=135111#comment-44905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are heavy trade offs to both systems Ameed. Each are good triggers in their right, both with their advantages and disadvantages. I would rate PW3s and Radio Poppers each at 5/5]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are heavy trade offs to both systems Ameed. Each are good triggers in their right, both with their advantages and disadvantages. I would rate PW3s and Radio Poppers each at 5/5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ameed El-Ghoul</title>
		<link>http://www.slrlounge.com/gear-review-why-we-love-the-pocket-wizard-plus-iii#comment-44904</link>
		<dc:creator>Ameed El-Ghoul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slrlounge.com/?p=135111#comment-44904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wouldn&#039;t rate this at 5 stars!! I don&#039;t care if it is the the industry standard or not. 5/5 means it is perfect .. and it is not. Untill bocketwizard include the TLL capability in it, it is only a 4!! Having to buy a set for normal operation, and another one for TTL, means there is a space for improvement, and I am holding on getting the BocketWizard till there is one reciever that gets all my required done. Like RadioPopper for example. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t rate this at 5 stars!! I don&#8217;t care if it is the the industry standard or not. 5/5 means it is perfect .. and it is not. Untill bocketwizard include the TLL capability in it, it is only a 4!! Having to buy a set for normal operation, and another one for TTL, means there is a space for improvement, and I am holding on getting the BocketWizard till there is one reciever that gets all my required done. Like RadioPopper for example. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pye</title>
		<link>http://www.slrlounge.com/gear-review-why-we-love-the-pocket-wizard-plus-iii#comment-44842</link>
		<dc:creator>Pye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 23:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slrlounge.com/?p=135111#comment-44842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They rate them at 250th of a second, but we still see shutter/sync issues at that speed, reliably at 200th of a second which means you will still need an ND filter in certain situations (like shooting wide open in the middle of the day). ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They rate them at 250th of a second, but we still see shutter/sync issues at that speed, reliably at 200th of a second which means you will still need an ND filter in certain situations (like shooting wide open in the middle of the day). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick C N Wong</title>
		<link>http://www.slrlounge.com/gear-review-why-we-love-the-pocket-wizard-plus-iii#comment-44841</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick C N Wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slrlounge.com/?p=135111#comment-44841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What type of receiver do they pair with(cheapest way)?  I have a standard nikon speedlite and an alienbees.  I think at most I&#039;ll get 1 or 2 editional alienbees but I&#039;ll stick with those lower cost unit for a long time.  I was using cyber sync and it was okay reliable with their price.  But syncspeed can&#039;t go over 1/160 which drives me crazy sometimes.  If pocketwizard can replace them it will be awewsome although I don&#039;t think I need those fancy grouping just yet (cuz I hve to run to my bees and push it physically anyway).   Any suggestions?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What type of receiver do they pair with(cheapest way)?  I have a standard nikon speedlite and an alienbees.  I think at most I&#8217;ll get 1 or 2 editional alienbees but I&#8217;ll stick with those lower cost unit for a long time.  I was using cyber sync and it was okay reliable with their price.  But syncspeed can&#8217;t go over 1/160 which drives me crazy sometimes.  If pocketwizard can replace them it will be awewsome although I don&#8217;t think I need those fancy grouping just yet (cuz I hve to run to my bees and push it physically anyway).   Any suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 393/402 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d2icr5g9bedq6k.cloudfront.net
Application Monitoring using New Relic

 Served from: www.slrlounge.com @ 2013-05-24 16:06:54 by W3 Total Cache -->