<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Equipment &#8211; Should I Buy a Canon or Nikon Camera?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slrlounge.com/equipment-should-i-buy-a-canon-or-nikon-camera/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slrlounge.com/equipment-should-i-buy-a-canon-or-nikon-camera</link>
	<description>Photography tips and photography tutorials and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slrlounge.com/equipment-should-i-buy-a-canon-or-nikon-camera#comment-41044</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 06:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slrlounge.com/?p=2142#comment-41044</guid>
		<description>
iPad is the new advocate electronic artefact by Apple. It is a book PC
 with awful avant-garde appearance meant for Internet browsing, gaming, 
media consumption, and ablaze agreeable creation.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iPad is the new advocate electronic artefact by Apple. It is a book PC<br />
 with awful avant-garde appearance meant for Internet browsing, gaming,<br />
media consumption, and ablaze agreeable creation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micalaryas Micalaryas</title>
		<link>http://www.slrlounge.com/equipment-should-i-buy-a-canon-or-nikon-camera#comment-40909</link>
		<dc:creator>Micalaryas Micalaryas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slrlounge.com/?p=2142#comment-40909</guid>
		<description>Time ashen on selecting a camera is time ashen on acquirements how to 
use the apparatus and yield acceptable pics. Period. Both Canon and 
Nikon are solid. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time ashen on selecting a camera is time ashen on acquirements how to<br />
use the apparatus and yield acceptable pics. Period. Both Canon and<br />
Nikon are solid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iLifephotography</title>
		<link>http://www.slrlounge.com/equipment-should-i-buy-a-canon-or-nikon-camera#comment-7059</link>
		<dc:creator>iLifephotography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slrlounge.com/?p=2142#comment-7059</guid>
		<description>wow, this got some serious responses, is the camera not but just a tool to lay down our creativity, its your mind that sees the picture the camera just captures it for you !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, this got some serious responses, is the camera not but just a tool to lay down our creativity, its your mind that sees the picture the camera just captures it for you !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fried Toast</title>
		<link>http://www.slrlounge.com/equipment-should-i-buy-a-canon-or-nikon-camera#comment-5608</link>
		<dc:creator>Fried Toast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slrlounge.com/?p=2142#comment-5608</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a bit squeezed for time, so I didn&#039;t have a chance to read every single comment. However, in glancing over the last few, I didn&#039;t see any reference to the point I want to make.

Before buying, go hang out w/ friends/fellow shooters and see if you can&#039;t borrow some of the cameras throughout the day to shoot with for awhile. Flickr meets are especially good for this. You&#039;ll get a great idea of how the camera(s) operate and how easy they are for you to use.

If that&#039;s not an option, then perhaps renting would be an option. There are places online that one can generally rent from. Definitely something worth checking out.

If renting is also a no-go, then last resort would be to go to a camera store and hold them there. I put this option as last simply because you don&#039;t have any time with it. And bright lighting in the store isn&#039;t exactly a great way to test out the camera (esp. if you&#039;re looking at a high-ISO cam). 

Try not to make any judgements on the cameras based on the lenses (for example a Canon 30D w/ kit lens vs a Nikon D700 w/ 24-70mm f2.8 would be completely unfair). Glass is important! Yes! But, just like picking a monitor that is comfortable for you to look at, I think it&#039;s just as important to find a body that fits your hands. If it doesn&#039;t feel right, then are you going to *want* to go outside and go shooting? Are you going to want to carry it around all day on hikes or trips if it doesn&#039;t feel right in your hands? Ergonomics is VERY important, IMO. One of THE most important points, IMHO. 

Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit squeezed for time, so I didn&#8217;t have a chance to read every single comment. However, in glancing over the last few, I didn&#8217;t see any reference to the point I want to make.</p>
<p>Before buying, go hang out w/ friends/fellow shooters and see if you can&#8217;t borrow some of the cameras throughout the day to shoot with for awhile. Flickr meets are especially good for this. You&#8217;ll get a great idea of how the camera(s) operate and how easy they are for you to use.</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s not an option, then perhaps renting would be an option. There are places online that one can generally rent from. Definitely something worth checking out.</p>
<p>If renting is also a no-go, then last resort would be to go to a camera store and hold them there. I put this option as last simply because you don&#8217;t have any time with it. And bright lighting in the store isn&#8217;t exactly a great way to test out the camera (esp. if you&#8217;re looking at a high-ISO cam). </p>
<p>Try not to make any judgements on the cameras based on the lenses (for example a Canon 30D w/ kit lens vs a Nikon D700 w/ 24-70mm f2.8 would be completely unfair). Glass is important! Yes! But, just like picking a monitor that is comfortable for you to look at, I think it&#8217;s just as important to find a body that fits your hands. If it doesn&#8217;t feel right, then are you going to *want* to go outside and go shooting? Are you going to want to carry it around all day on hikes or trips if it doesn&#8217;t feel right in your hands? Ergonomics is VERY important, IMO. One of THE most important points, IMHO. </p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pye</title>
		<link>http://www.slrlounge.com/equipment-should-i-buy-a-canon-or-nikon-camera#comment-5597</link>
		<dc:creator>Pye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 02:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slrlounge.com/?p=2142#comment-5597</guid>
		<description>Tara, 

You make a good point. Sony, does make great camera systems as well. The reason why I didn&#039;t include them in the article is because most amateur to new professional photographers are better served by choosing either Canon or Nikon. Why? Because of the support system and availability of manufacturer lenses and components, as well as third party lenses and components. 

Sure, Sony makes a good camera and there are many people that use their systems. However, if you are new to photography, you would definitely be at a disadvantage as most in the industry is using Nikon or Canon. You wouldn&#039;t be able to share lenses, equipment, experience and camera system knowledge with friends. 

Hopefully, that helps in clarifying why we stuck to Canon and Nikon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tara, </p>
<p>You make a good point. Sony, does make great camera systems as well. The reason why I didn&#8217;t include them in the article is because most amateur to new professional photographers are better served by choosing either Canon or Nikon. Why? Because of the support system and availability of manufacturer lenses and components, as well as third party lenses and components. </p>
<p>Sure, Sony makes a good camera and there are many people that use their systems. However, if you are new to photography, you would definitely be at a disadvantage as most in the industry is using Nikon or Canon. You wouldn&#8217;t be able to share lenses, equipment, experience and camera system knowledge with friends. </p>
<p>Hopefully, that helps in clarifying why we stuck to Canon and Nikon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.slrlounge.com @ 2012-02-09 02:15:42 -->
